Global warming is a worldwide issue, not necessarily a personal problem. The effects of global warming vary with the individual. The individual has their view either reinforced or crumbled by personal research or by the worldwide media. Without the proper information on this subject it is easy to be manipulated by the news to convert you to their explanation of the problem. The media like main stream news networks, exaggerates and blows out of proportion the real scientific facts that have been proven. They skew the facts in the favor of the organizations benefit not necessarily for the cold hard truth. The negatives seem to outweigh the positives in our society which gives the people a biased opinion. With the proper research the isolated positives are spread throughout the people of the world. Through research I have come to change my views about this so called "World Destroyer Global Warming." It may be the calling of change or equilibrium that will lead to progress and collaboration of the Earth. With the benefits of global warming acknowledged the exaggerated World Ender can be diminished into a neutral partner that guides us through the changes that are occurring right now. Global warming can be the overall positive change that this world desperately craves.

Forbes identifies the true facts about the "global warming" issue. 97% of scientists approve of the global warming thought that manmade Co2 is warming the earth. There are both positive and negative aspects of global warming. This article wants to explain what the non- exaggerated global warning truly is. The increase in warmth can be have positive and negative aspects. The argument is a controversy but the negative aspect is highlighted more because of the natural illiteracy from people about global warming. The earth is warming up but the consequences vary and contradict each other. The bias is equally involved in both arguments and the article is from a credible website and source. A popular economist Warren Meyer, MBA from Harvard University and years of experience with planning and forecasting at several Fortune 50 companies. Also he writes for a well-known and reputable business and economic website.

Smithsonian explains how the individual has to change to have a beneficial change on global warming. The media needs to properly inform and explain the details that science provides. Major countries already place global warming on the podium for the most important issue so why doesn't the United States have the same priority? This informs the public and creates a universal unification for a specific cause. The problem is the individualism of the American people along with much of the world. The people need to think about the consequences of not acting on the problem at hand. Global Warming is a worldwide issue that affects mankind across the world.  Smithsonian is a credible organization and research organization that does have the incentive that global warming needs to change now. Has a high reliability and the Arthur is a climate reporter with a BA in English from Wellesley College. Natasha values what the world needs to sustain life along with the need for human beings to continue to strive.

NewsMax claims that global warming has two sides to the problem which includes the         importance and reliability of the claims that are being introduced to the public. The planet is warming but what is the true reason? Is CO2 the compound which will change the climate system that relates to extreme weather? The land and oceans have not increased in temperature which negates the pro-human caused warming.The basic question of whether the human activity is really causing problems. Independent News article that features 5 facts that cannot be disputed by both global warming sides. Newsmax is a right sided conservative biased company but the author is a business news broadcaster along with a media relations consulter(BS in journalism from Kansas University.

The question can be argued on two fronts. The natural occurrence of global warming or the incorporation of human activity on global warming. Co2 may not cause extreme weather and that the oceans and land are not warming up. The warmer temperature can alter geographic landmarks and resources along with the spread of specific diseases. It opened my eyes to the fact that the media exaggerates the facts about global warming and only highlights the negative aspects without incorporating the positive. Leave it an equally balanced argument with a hint of factual evidence that the human activity on the environment is not only help global warming but degrading our earth slowly and depleting our planet's resources.

